This post is retained unchanged for reference. It reflects the position when it was published and has not been updated, so it may not state the current law. For current analysis, see the practice-area pages and recent posts.
Used under a creative commons licence granted by Alejandro Linares Garcia
“Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead parrot when I see one, and I’m looking at one right now.
Owner: No no he’s not dead, he’s, he’s restin’! Remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue, idn’it, ay? Beautiful plumage!”
– Monty Python
Based on a press release from the World Trade Organisation, and tweets from its Director-General Roberto Azevedo it would appear that the WTO is about to defy persistent reports of its death and come back to life with its first agreement on tariff elimination in eighteen years.
Covering a wide range of technology and IT products including new generation semi-conductors, GPS navigation equipment and medical equipment, including magnetic resonance imaging products and ultra-sonic scanning apparatus, the proposed agreement will lead to the elimination of import tariffs in a uniform and non-discriminatory manner – the [no WTO member is treated worse than the] ‘most-favoured nation’ principle. The WTO estimates that the value of trade covered by the prospective agreement amounts to USD 1 trillion.
In recent decades, the process required to reach agreement at the WTO has resulted in deadlock and an increased focus on regional trade negotiations such as TPP, in part because these are perceived as being easier to reach agreement by virtue of involving a smaller group of participants amongst whom a common goal can be agreed. Further, whilst students of David Ricardo still extol the virtues of free-trade, in recent years the WTO has come under both attack from populist anti-globalisation movements and domestic anti-trade liberalisation political pressure in many countries against trade liberalisation.
Against this backdrop, why does it now seem likely that the WTO will reach an agreement including the world’s largest trading blocs (US, China and EU) as well as much of SE Asia?The simple answer to this question is that everyone has something to gain. The reason for this is the global spread of technology – almost every country has technology exporters of some sort (bearing in mind that many manufacturing facilities for MNCs are in low wage economies) and/or see clear benefits in importing technology.
It is welcome to see that the global community still sees the benefit of global trade agreements – the next big question is whether this will lead to a wider reinvigoration of the WTO as means of advancing trade negotiations, as opposed to regional negotiations like the TPP?
Subscribe below for updates on telecoms regulation, or contact Rob Bratby at Bratby Law.
Ofcom’s consultation on how high-density areas are defined for Upper 6 GHz (6425-7125 MHz) subnational mobile licences closes on 6 July 2026. What MNOs and enterprise campus operators must know.
In short: Ofcom chair 2026: The government confirmed Sir Ian Cheshire as Chair of Ofcom on 3 June 2026, after the Science, Innovation and Technology Committee endorsed him at a pre-appointment hearing on 20 May 2026 and urged him to deepen his grasp of online safety. He succeeds Lord Grade, whose term ended in April…
In short: the 1.4 GHz spectrum auction will offer a single 25 MHz block, the range 1492 to 1517 MHz, of supplementary downlink capacity for 4G and 5G mobile. Ofcom decided on 11 June 2026 to sell it by sealed-bid auction with no spectrum cap and a £5m reserve. It expects to consult on the…
In short: Ofcom opened a funds for liabilities enforcement programme on 16 July 2026 into code operators’ compliance with regulation 16 of the Electronic Communications Code (Conditions and Restrictions) Regulations 2003, with immediate investigations into six operators it has reasonable grounds to believe may not have complied. The most recent annual certificate deadline was 1…
In short: Ofcom’s network resilience guidance, revised on 16 June 2026, now sets out what Ofcom expects of mobile operators on power backup at radio access network sites. It does not set a fixed number of hours of battery. The duty flows from section 105A of the Communications Act 2003 and Regulation 3 of the…
In short: Online safety fees are payable to Ofcom by providers of regulated services with a qualifying worldwide revenue of £250m or more, from the charging year beginning 1 April 2026. Until then Ofcom funded the regime from spectrum receipts it was permitted to retain. Its Annual Report and Accounts for 2025/26, published on 9…